News Epic Games Store

Tim thinks that the Tesla protests are funded by George Soros and Tesla competitors:


As if I needed another reason to dislike Timmy.
 
mDzcKou.png


uqAQqvs.png


I know it's not an apples:apples comparison as the CS numbers are people who are in client and Fortnite are people who are actually on a game server, but Fortnite's numbers are extremely swingy. Also FN peaks around 2.5 million on weekends, but still.

A lot of CS's player numbers are likely bots farming the new cases, but still.

Also Roblox dwarfs both games and peaked at like 8 million CCU today and >13 million on weekends.

Got money to buy AI shite but not enough to keep staff on payroll.
No but you see they're going to help with the Metaverse (that has less players than games like Schedule I).
 
Vey0b7W.png


Tim Sweeney chimes in with another banger of a political analogy.

The fact CSGO can get similar numbers to Fortnite despite CS being PC only and Fortnite being on almost everything is very impressive.
I was being a bit disingenuous as spring is usually Fortnite's low point for player numbers and it still does >2-2.5 million on the weekend. Also the CS numbers are inflated as there are a lot of bots farming cases, but Valve might be in the middle of a ban wave so numbers could drop a bit. I don't deny there's some degree of botting in CS, but I don't think it's as egregious as say Banana or Team Fortress 2.
 

Epic Games v. Apple judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers just ruled that, effective immediately, Apple is no longer allowed to collect fees on purchases made outside apps and blocks the company from restricting how developers can point users to where they can make purchases outside of apps.

As part of the ruling, Judge Rogers says that Apple cannot:
  • Impose “any commission or any fee on purchases that consumers make outside an app”
  • Restrict developers’ style, formatting, or placement of links for purchases outside of an app
  • Block or limit the “use of buttons or other calls to action”
  • Interfere with consumers’ choice to leave an app with anything beyond “a neutral message apprising users that they are going to a third-party site”
Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney says that, following this ruling, the company will bring Fortnite back to the US App Store “next week.” Sweeney is also offering a “peace proposal” from Epic: “If Apple extends the court’s friction-free, Apple-tax-free framework worldwide, we’ll return Fortnite to the App Store worldwide and drop current and future litigation on the topic.”

Apple got greedy.

Edit:

W2PghmY.jpeg


Like, really greedy.
 
Tim says big EGS news coming soon

I’m guessing mobile related.

0% Store Fee For First $1,000,000 in Revenue Per App Per Year
Starting in June 2025, for any Epic Games Store payments we process, developers will pay 0% fees on their first $1,000,000 in revenue and then our regular 88%/12% revenue share when they earn more than that.

Epic Games Store Webshops
In June 2025, we are releasing a new feature enabling developers to launch their own webshops hosted by the Epic Games Store. These webshops can offer players out-of-app purchases, as a more cost-effective alternative to in-app purchases, where Apple, Google, and others charge exorbitant fees. With new legal rulings in place, developers will be able to send players from games to make digital purchases from webshops on any platform that allows it, including iOS in the European Union and United States.

As an extra bonus, players spending in Epic Webshops will also accrue 5% Epic Rewards on all their purchases.

Edit: The blog post got pulled but that's probably the big news.

Edit2: The blog post is back but the $1 million is now per app per year instead of just lifetime revenue.
 
Last edited:
They're banking on a breakout F2P hit using their IAP functions. That and they will roll back the 0% fees over time (boiling the frog by incrementally dropping that $1m threshold down) if the service becomes well utilised.

I can see why Epic are making this. They're gonna have to do something like this to get Fortnite on iOS under terms they find acceptable, so might as well extend it to everyone else. They're not providing downloads or anything like that, so the main cost of this is the transaction fees that they'll be eating. Those are pretty small in the scheme of things, and at the scale Epic operates at with Fortnite they likely have a good deal with most companies dealing in that kinda thing.
 

Epic’s Games Store isn’t on Xbox, nor PlayStation nor Switch. And Epic’s Fortnite, which is on those platforms, doesn’t offer an alternate payment method.

So why doesn’t Epic have the same gripes with the console-makers?

Well, Sweeney told me, he’d like to open things up more on consoles: “I think the world would be a better place if consoles allowed for competing stores, but we haven't ever seen that as an antitrust dispute-worthy issue.”

Mask off baybee. I bet console fans would love that.
 


Sweeney notes that the 30 percent fee on consoles is more forgivable because the platforms create a market in part by selling systems at a loss, something that seems to be less the case than ever.

It's a weak argument as Nintendo hardware is famously profitable and the PS5 was only sold at a loss for a few months and profitable as of 2021 (but with tariff buffoonery who knows at this point). Also the $700 PS5 Pro is testing the waters for a more expensive base PS6 that won't lose as much money or even be profitable.

I think Microsoft's hardware has always been unprofitable, but I get the feeling that won't be the case going forward as they're slowly bowing out of the console market and future Xbox hardware will likely become an expensive boutique item.

I fully expect the next Xbox to support Steam and EGS. Sony and Nintendo though? Better start drafting those lawsuits.
 
I always found the they can charge you 30% because they sell at a loss a weak argument (and let's ignore that this gen console prices have been going UP). We all know that even if the iPhone was sold at a loss, all this would have happened all the same.
 
  • This!
Reactions: Le Pertti and Arc
I always found the they can charge you 30% because they sell at a loss a weak argument (and let's ignore that this gen console prices have been going UP). We all know that even if the iPhone was sold at a loss, all this would have happened all the same.
My argument has always been: so what? Nobody put a gun to the head of Sony and Microsoft execs to sell hardware at a loss. They don't have a god-given right to run a razor and blades model. If Apple has to open up, so should everyone else.