I voted it for it for ongoing but see it's also got votes in the main goty category there.
After a quick Ctrl+F check, this would not change the results much: some of the people who voted for it in the optional category also voted for it in the main category.
Plus, it would boost potential mistakes or debatable votes.
In Best Ongoing:
- Cyberpunk would get many more votes,
- Control: Ultimate Edition would get +6 votes
- Factorio would get +5 votes
- Halo: The Master Chief Collection would get +1 vote
- Deep Rock Galactic would get +1 vote
- Monster Hunter: World - Iceborne would get +1 vote
- Gears 5 - Hivebusters would get +1 vote
In Best Early Access,
- Cyberpunk would get many more votes
- Risk of Rain 2 would get +2 votes
- Prodeus would get +1 vote
- Satisfactory would get +1 vote
- Cook, Serve, Delicious! 3?! would get +1 vote
So, I would have to manually remove Cyberpunk from best ongoing and best EA, because the aggregation of votes would have boosted the 1-person joke.
Then, there is the question of former exclusive games like Control. Most people treat it as a new release, but 1 person considered that it is an ongoing game. And maybe it can be both, with its "ultimate edition" tag. By aggregating votes, I would significantly boost the 1-person opinion, instead of averaging it out.
Similarly for Factorio and Deep Rock, both have been actually released in 2020, so their place would rather be in the Goty section (because full release would be version 1.0 released in 2020).
Overall:
- in every optional category, the first place would be awarded to the same game, at least this year,
- this would force me to perform more drastic checks, e.g. to avoid counting twice votes by people who cast the same ballot in goty and ongoing,
- this would force me to remove some entries, e.g. boosted jokes,
The more I have to edit votes, the more personal and debatable bias I add to the results. I am more in favor of errors/opinions being averaged out in optional categories. Otherwise, it would only require 1-2 people (the 1-person voter plus myself, and I could be both) to artificially boost Cyberpunk, Control or Factorio near the top of an optional category. Too much risk (error, bias, vote manipulation), with potential for drama, for zero reward. I would rather go with transparency and minimal intervention to correct/remove the very few and most obvious issues.