I'm sorry to get all political here, but given the recent takes on privacy etc. I really have to add my 2 cents.
Especially since I feel like some opinions are verging too close to libertarianism -- that most vapid and childish of all political frameworks.
The reality is this: with the global ascendancy of capitalism, the realistic choices you can make are between multi-national corporations and billionaires having all the power, or governments (and international institutions) having at least some of it.
The difference is that, as a normal person, (i) you do have some say in your government; you have zero influence on multinationals (no, when the vast majority of revenue comes from B2B, even the [always tenuous] idea of "voting with your wallet" becomes completely immaterial); and (ii) government policies, actions and so on are documented and can be designed to have oversight -- private corporations do not.
This is why billionaires are on the side of championing (their idea of) "freedom of speech": because in our capitalist framework, what this means in practice when taken to its logical conclusion is that they have almost infinite control over what kind of speech gets any sort of mainstream platform.
Of course this does not mean that every government initiative is good, or well-planned, or well-executed. But going from that to the idea that we shouldn't even try is exactly what the Epstein class wants.
(Which is of course also why they destroy all good governance and meaningful institutions when they get a chance to, as we can observe in the US; "proving" that government doesn't work)