|OT| The 2026 Metacouncil Reading Challenge

NarohDethan

There was a fish in the percolator!
Apr 6, 2019
10,168
28,792
113
By popular demand (three guys).

Similar to the Finished Games thread, here’s an space to share and discuss the books we have read this year.

There’s no criteria to what counts as finished other than you being done with the book, but I’d encourage to set a goal of books to read.
 
Personal goal: 12 books (so I should read at least one each month).

Currently reading:

This is Amiko, do you copy? by Natsuko Imamura
Three Body Problem by Cixin Liu
Demon Haunted World by Carl Sagan

Finished:

1. The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams 5/5
2. Abroad In Japan by Chris Broad 1.5/5
 
Last edited:
I'm following a genre fiction podcast (Shelved by Genre -- check them out) and they usually do units of like 2-3 months on a series of books or comics or whatever. This time they are doing the mainline Tolkien books (Hobbit, Lord of the Rings, Silmarillion -- in that order). And planning a leisurely pace. So my goal is at least those before end of the year. Hopefully add several more too.
 
55022785208_a3122ff2c8_n.jpg

Mind you, I'm counting comics that have GR entries there (and plan to read a bunch of Amazing Spider-Man this year, that's why the number is so high)
My completion rates for previous years are:
2023 (88) - 24 'proper' books
2024 (228) - 23 'proper' books
2025 (185) - 44 'proper' books
 
  • Sweating
  • Like
Reactions: oipic and lashman
Personal goal: My challenge for this year is 15 books (I'm not counting comics or manga but I'll comment on them anyway).

Currently reading: What I Ate in One Year from Stanley Tucci. My mom recommended this to me and I don't know why but I'm actually reading it :face-with-open-mouth-and-cold-sweat:
 
  • Comfy
Reactions: lashman
Book 2:

51BA4+t44gL._AC_UF1000,1000_QL80_.jpg



Kinda nice to read of the exact circumstances that lead to the writing of his books, but nothing particularily mindblowing.

DjQTLpE.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: lashman and xinek
Finished Mortis.
Not great IMO, didnt really get into a lot of the characters except returning ones from the earlier books in the series.

Onto Warhawk
WarhawkCover.webp
 
  • Comfy
Reactions: lashman
Personal goal: My challenge for this year is 15 books (I'm not counting comics or manga but I'll comment on them anyway).

Currently reading: What I Ate in One Year from Stanley Tucci. My mom recommended this to me and I don't know why but I'm actually reading it :face-with-open-mouth-and-cold-sweat:
Finished.

It's a shame because I enjoyed his previous book in a way, which I considered recommendable despite not being my usual genre.

This is merely a diary of film shoots and luxury trips, a far cry from those intimate moments of childhood and the culinary culture of the children of immigrants from the previous one. In this book, he seems much more accustomed to a life of luxury, and his snobbery has risen several notches, complaining about every little thing related to food, hotels, or travel.

On top of all this, for some reason, the man can't stop making jokes and insinuating that his wife is unfaithful to him during his “business trips,” which makes the whole experience even stranger.

I don't recommend it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stevey and lashman
Book 1:
53046882.jpg


It's a weird series, world building is amazing, there's almost no plot to speak of (although that changes in this volume). Translation quality/writing is bad bordering on terrible, but improves from volume to volume.
Let's see where it goes in next part, in a few months time. I've had my fill of Myne for now.

Book 2:
455373.jpg


I wish the book stayed sf - the beginning when is strong but turns into weird psychological musings midway through to its detriment
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Stevey and lashman
Book 5:

71BR5wa66OL._UF1000,1000_QL80_.jpg


Read one entry each night before going to sleep, to properly mull over it.
Not every contribution is a hit, but its one of the rawest things i've ever read
 
  • Hug
  • Like
Reactions: xinek and lashman
Book 6:

711hUvzvB7L._AC_UF894,1000_QL80_.jpg



The worst book i've ever read, i wanna beat the shit out of all these failed abortions that praise it as some sort of master piece in a vain attempt to disguise themselfs as intellectual. Fucking Kant's Three Critiques are less dry than this misbegotten garbage. "BUT IT PLAYS WITH THE FORM OF THE MEDIUM" I HEAR THEM SAY, I PLAY WITH THE FORM OF YOUR MOM YOU PIECE OF SHIT
 
  • Toucan
Reactions: lashman
I forgot to mention it here, but in April I read Bad Habit by Alana S. Portero.

Pleasant surprise, not my sort of book but i was hooked, it was a very moving story about the trans experience in the 80/90s in Spain. It makes you think just how long and winding the road to self-acceptance can be.
 
Finished reading Single Player by Tara Tai. Meh, not for me.

It was an easy read and it doesn't drag on too much but I didn't really get on with the content. I don't really like the romance/rivalry books and i felt the book relied too much on misunderstandings which quickly becomes old.
 
Fellowship of the Ring done. On to the two Towers.

Also read the Maltese Falcon. That's a fun story. some of the old timey language gets a bit hard to read, but after looking up a few old fashioned words it went over fine. Most of what I didn't know were old slang words for detectives, police, guns and some very offensive (now) racial slurs. So uh... it is a product of its time (1920s America), but the story being told is great. And the 1940s era movie starrting Humphrey Bogart is great too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lashman
Finished Faust Eric from Terry Pratchett. Needed a short book since I was kinda busy for the last couple of days and Pratchett never disappoints, fun little novel.
 
  • Gib
  • Like
Reactions: QFNS and lashman
Book 7:

338c71d7a57f82cdbeeb628ec62598b7_original.png


Too unfocused, taking on the form of a scrambled interview more so than a structured book, it's okay
At least i have a copy signed by taro himself uwu
 
  • Like
Reactions: lashman
Finished up Fellowship of the Ring, now about 2/3rds through Two Towers. I never thought about this before, but what two towers are they talking about in this book? They don't ever really spell it out, you can maybe infer they mean Saruman's tower Orthanc and Barad-dur for Sauron, but they mention Gondor's various towers (Osgiliath, Minas Tirith) quite a bit too and the book doesn't really talk a ton about Barad-dur directly. Strange point that I hadn't really ever thought about until now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lashman
Finished up Fellowship of the Ring, now about 2/3rds through Two Towers. I never thought about this before, but what two towers are they talking about in this book? They don't ever really spell it out, you can maybe infer they mean Saruman's tower Orthanc and Barad-dur for Sauron, but they mention Gondor's various towers (Osgiliath, Minas Tirith) quite a bit too and the book doesn't really talk a ton about Barad-dur directly. Strange point that I hadn't really ever thought about until now.
Minas Morgul and Orthanc, canonically.
But the obvious answer is 1 World Trade Center and 2 World Trade Center :smart-thinking-blob:
 
  • Like
Reactions: lashman
Minas Morgul and Orthanc, canonically.
But the obvious answer is 1 World Trade Center and 2 World Trade Center :smart-thinking-blob:
Next you're going to tell me, Mordor and Sauron are a reference to World War 2!

The funny thing to me was how not clear it was for so much of the book. Minas Morgul doesn't get brought up until the back half of the book. These days most books hit you over the head with their themes and make it abundantly obvious. Two Towers ignores one of the towers for about 60% of the time lol. Still a great book, but interesting to note on the reread.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lashman
Next you're going to tell me, Mordor and Sauron are a reference to World War 2!

The funny thing to me was how not clear it was for so much of the book. Minas Morgul doesn't get brought up until the back half of the book. These days most books hit you over the head with their themes and make it abundantly obvious. Two Towers ignores one of the towers for about 60% of the time lol. Still a great book, but interesting to note on the reread.

Tolkien inteded The Lord of the Rings as a single book (internally divided into six books). Due to the publisher’s decision and the printing practices of the time, it was decided to split the book into three separate volumes, and Tolkien had to name them.

The names proved to be a challenge for Tolkien (he didn't like Return of the King either, too on the nose, he prefered The War of the Ring), but the second volume proved to be a special source of conflict for Tolkien, as the initial debate centred on where to ‘cut’ the first and third volumes in order to decide what the second volume would contain and give it a suitable title. The two volumes that made up what is now the second book were The Treason of Isengard and The Ring Goes East, which were such different stories that he found it difficult to choose a title that would do them justice.

In fact in one of his letter Tolkien said:

"The Two Towers gets as near as possible to finding a title to cover the widely divergent Books 3 and 4; and can be left ambiguous – it might refer to Isengard and Barad-dûr, or to Minas Tirith and Barad-dûr; or Isengard and Cirith Ungol. "

Additionally, later in another letter he said:

"I am not at all happy about the title 'the Two Towers'. It must if there is any real reference in it to Vol II refer to Orthanc and the Tower of Cirith Ungol. But since there is so much made of the basic opposition of the Dark Tower and Minas Tirith, that seems very misleading."

After that, he apparently made up his mind, Tolkien included at the end of the copy of Fellowship of the Ring sent to the publisher a note that said that the second volume would be titled The Two Towers, since the events of that book were centered mainly around Orthanc and Minas Morgul.

So yeah, it's kinda messy because... it was and he struggled with the names and changed his mind for all three of the titles quite a lot.

Actually, I've just realised what a long-winded rant I've just gone on about something so trivial , sorry.
 
  • Like
  • Comfy
Reactions: lashman and QFNS
Book 8:

81xCbElwdDL._AC_UF894,1000_QL80_.jpg


I learned a lot of new words that i will be using in the future, get ready
 
  • Gib
Reactions: lashman
Book 9:

51V-paV6neL._AC_UF894,1000_QL80_.jpg


Feels more like reading lorewiki for an unreleased Sci-fi horror game than an actual book, but as far as that goes it's really cool.
I especially like how the story ends with the author telling us that none of that shit matters and to go out and get laid already
 
  • Like
Reactions: lashman
I've completed Two Towers and am about halfway through Return of the King. I'm more interested in getting to the Silmarillion now than before. We'll see how it goes.
 
Life got in the way of exams and work, so I’ve had to cut back. Over the last two months, I’ve only read one book in Spanish that hasn’t been translated into other languages (the closest would be "Crazy Stories from History"). It’s been an entertaining read, ideal for a busy period at work when I could only read in short bursts. It is a collection of stories based on historical anecdotes, nothing particularly innovative, but entertaining


Now with more time I'm back with some classic Terry Pratchett, I'm reading Equal Rites.
 
Next you're going to tell me, Mordor and Sauron are a reference to World War 2!
I beg your pardon because I can't tell if you're serious or this is a common joke around TLOR akin to "did you know Viggo Mortensen broke his foot when he kicked--" :surrenderblob:

Anyway, I too have been (slowly) reading The Lord of the Rings and am halfway through book 4 at the moment. Been jumping through a lot of books in the last few months, namely The Sandman ( one of the best things I ever experienced in media), Atelier of Witch Hat (full of clichés but beautiful art), Blood on the Tracks by Shuzo Oshimi (chilling story about incest and Oedipus complex), Geist Maschine by LRNZ (first of a 3 parts graphic novel, loved it), In Cold Blood, Chapterhouse: Dune and various other stuff.

So why did I only came here now? Well because today I'm feeling particularly frustrated about general media illiteracy that is especially present in gaming and movies communities; too many people being ignorant and conceited at the same time and today I can't stand it.
Books require active commitment, unlike videogames and movies/TV that too many experience in a passive way. Or maybe is just a pop culture problem, I don't know. But today I want to talk about books knowing that the one (virtually) in front of me at least took some effort to understand what they're experiencing.

/rant
 
  • Toucan
Reactions: lashman
I beg your pardon because I can't tell if you're serious or this is a common joke around TLOR akin to "did you know Viggo Mortensen broke his foot when he kicked--" :surrenderblob:
I mean yes, the reading of Lord of the Rings as Tolkien working through his thoughts on WW2 (and WW1 to some extent) is a very common interpretation of these books. Sauron/Orcs are shown as building great machines of war, despoiling nature, and so on. It's a obvious parallel to the wars in Europe. Tolkien, I think, resisted this reading but I don't see how you can deny that it exists. It's also how you get dumb billionaires naming their war companies after things from these books because they sound cool and think they are good guys defending against evil, which ignores the point the books are making that all the war is bad and everyone loses.

My point above was the book The Two Towers does a bad job of telling you about which two towers it is referring to, and then the other poster made a joke about it being the twin towers in NYC, so I responded with a joke about the most obvious reading possible. There's no secret.
 
My point above was the book The Two Towers does a bad job of telling you about which two towers it is referring to, and then the other poster made a joke about it being the twin towers in NYC, so I responded with a joke about the most obvious reading possible. There's no secret.
 
  • Toucan
Reactions: QFNS
I mean yes, the reading of Lord of the Rings as Tolkien working through his thoughts on WW2 (and WW1 to some extent) is a very common interpretation of these books. Sauron/Orcs are shown as building great machines of war, despoiling nature, and so on. It's a obvious parallel to the wars in Europe. Tolkien, I think, resisted this reading but I don't see how you can deny that it exists. It's also how you get dumb billionaires naming their war companies after things from these books because they sound cool and think they are good guys defending against evil, which ignores the point the books are making that all the war is bad and everyone loses.

My point above was the book The Two Towers does a bad job of telling you about which two towers it is referring to, and then the other poster made a joke about it being the twin towers in NYC, so I responded with a joke about the most obvious reading possible. There's no secret.
Ok I get what you mean.
Yes it is a common interpretation, but Tolkien totally rejected the reading of The Lord of the Rings as an allegory of WW2, and he stated that very clearly in the afterword to the second edition of the book:

"As for any inner meaning or ‘message’, it has in the intention of the author none. It is neither allegorical nor topical. [...] The crucial chapter, ‘The Shadow of the Past’, is one of the oldest parts of the tale. It was written long before the foreshadow of 1939 had yet become a threat of inevitable disaster, and from that point the story would have developed along essentially the same lines, if that disaster had been averted. Its sources are things long before in mind, or in some cases already written, and little or nothing in it was modified by the war that began in 1939 or its sequels."

He added that of course one could find real life similarities , but generally speaking he had enough of authors writing metaphors about the real world

"Other arrangements could be devised according to the tastes or views of those who like allegory or topical reference. But I cordially dislike allegory in all its manifestations, and always have done so since I grew old and wary enough to detect its presence."

That being said, it is very clear the book is against war and greed, and billionaires are very stupid.